The text of this incontro is: “When a fencer has parried an attack and rests on the parry, and then ripostes late and is touched by a simple replacement or second thrust, the defender is responsible for the double hit and error.”
If Fencer A attacks, and is parried by Fencer B, and Fencer B rests on the parry, Fencer A can renew the attack. If Fencer B then ripostes, they are at fault. The distinction between this case, and the 3rd case is the timing of the riposte.
December 30, 2009
4th Incontro
Leave a Comment »
No comments yet.
Leave a comment